The English court system are a essential part of the British legal framework. One of the most controversial aspects of court funding in the UK has been the cuts to the Ministry of Justice's budget in recent years. Since the onset of austerity measures, the UK government has implemented a series of cuts to public services, including the judiciary. As a result, the Ministry of Justice has had to make difficult decisions about how to allocate resources to the courts. These cuts have led to court closures, with many courts facing staff reductions and diminished support services. As the UK’s court system struggles with these financial pressures, there have been growing concerns that access to justice is being undermined. In the face of these difficulties, the Ministry of Justice continues to explore alternative funding models for the UK’s court system. One option being considered is the introduction of alternative funding mechanisms. Some have suggested that introducing new fees or seeking private investment in the judicial system could help alleviate the strain on public finances. In response to these funding challenges, the Ministry of Justice has introduced a number of initiatives aimed at improving efficiency. One of the most notable of these is the digital reforms in the judiciary. This initiative seeks to reduce costs and improve access by allowing for online case filings, remote hearings, and digital case management. The goal is to streamline court procedures, reduce administrative costs, and speed up the processing of cases. However, critics argue that these digital reforms may disproportionately affect individuals who are not digitally literate or those without access to the necessary technology. Access to justice is a key issue in Wales, particularly in rural and post-industrial areas. Court closures in recent years have raised concerns about people having to travel long distances for legal proceedings.